What People Think Data Science Is vs What It Actually Is (Be Honest)

The gap between the hype and the work no one sees.

Read time: 2.5 minutes

Data science looks impressive from the outside. From the inside, it looks familiar.

From the outside, data science looks like breakthrough models, clever algorithms, and dashboards that magically answer hard questions. It’s presented as elegant, powerful, and almost effortless. A few lines of code, a few charts, and suddenly there’s insight.

From the inside, it’s reopening the same dataset for the thirteenth time because one column still isn’t quite right. It’s renaming values that should have been standardized years ago, checking edge cases that only show up in production, and fixing problems that don’t feel new but refuse to stay fixed. The “model” comes later. First, the data has to behave.

Why the Same Column Gets Cleaned Again and Again?

  • Data sources change without warning.

  • Definitions drift over time.

  • Edge cases only appear at scale.

  • “Temporary fixes” become permanent.

  • Upstream issues stay unresolved.

None of this shows up in conference talks. All of it shows up in real work.

💡Key Takeaway: 

What makes data science valuable isn’t the moment a model runs successfully. It’s the quiet persistence of making unreliable data usable over and over again. Cleaning the same column thirteen times isn’t failure. It’s the work itself. The insight only matters because someone made the data trustworthy first.

👉 LIKE this if you’ve cleaned the same column more times than you can count.

👉 SUBSCRIBE now for honest takes on how data work actually gets done.

👉 Follow Glenda Carnate for practical insights beyond the hype.

👉 COMMENT with the column that keeps coming back to haunt you.

👉 SHARE this with someone who thinks data science is just modeling.

Reply

or to participate.