The Unit Economics Problem No AI Pitch Likes to Show

Adoption is easy. Profit is harder.

Author

Glenda Carnate
December 19, 2025

Read time: 2.5 minutes

Every AI pitch sounds inevitable until someone opens the cost model, and that’s usually the moment the caffeine comes out.

The deck is polished. The demo works. Slides promise scale, efficiency, and a future where intelligence is everywhere. Then the unit economics slide appears, and the room changes. Someone asks about cost per inference. Another wonders how pricing holds under competition.

Coffee refills quietly increase as the math gets massaged, assumptions stretch, and timelines move just far enough into the future to stay optimistic. By the time the meeting ends, belief is high, clarity is low, and the question of how many coffees it took is no longer countable. Yes.

Where AI Hype Collides With Unit Economics?

  • Cost per query vs. revenue per customer

  • Compute efficiency vs. competitive pressure

  • Gross margin targets vs. infrastructure reality

  • “At scale” promises vs. current burn rates

  • Who absorbs volatility when demand spikes

This is where stories become businesses — or don’t.

💡Key Takeaway: 

AI doesn’t become investable when the story gets louder… it becomes investable when the math stops fighting back.

Until then, coffee remains the most reliable input.

👉 LIKE this if fundamentals still matter.

👉 SUBSCRIBE now for clear-eyed takes on AI economics.

👉 Follow Glenda Carnate or signal over hype.

👉 COMMENT: Where does AI economics still break down?

👉 SHARE this with someone building the next AI deck.

Reply

or to participate.