• Daily Success Snacks
  • Posts
  • 5 Brutal Truths No One Admits About Why Most ‘AI in BI’ Projects Fail Before They Even Start

5 Brutal Truths No One Admits About Why Most ‘AI in BI’ Projects Fail Before They Even Start

You’re either over-engineering architecture or shipping outputs no one trusts.

Read time: 2.5 minutes

This harsh truth is that “most AI + BI initiatives fail not due to lack of functionality but due to teams optimizing layers ineffectively.”

A team creates flawless architecture, and no one uses it, or another team ships quickly but produces untrustworthy results. Either interpretation of success leads to no difference or effect.

The issue is not about the speed/scale of an AI or BI solution… it's about its irrelevance to actual decisions.

What Breaks AI In BI (And How To Fix It)

1. Over-engineering delays true value.

  • Using complex pipes and frameworks does not guarantee usage by users or businesses.

  • Systems designed without decision-making impact are most likely to go unused by end users or others involved in business decision-making processes.

Fixes:

  • Build a thin end-to-end flow and ship it first.

  • Make sure it connects AI to structured output to BI to decision.

2. Under-engineering destroys trust.

  • Due to the lack of structured data, rapid result production can undermine structure and yield inconsistent or low-quality, unvalidated results.

  • A missing validation schema requires rework on outputs.

Fixes:

  • Establish a minimum viable structured workflow.

  • Include a schema, validation, and store output from day 1.

3. AI and BI mixed causes both to fail.

  • By directly embedding AI into BI dashboards, performance is significantly slowed, and the lack of defined logic may leave users without a clear understanding of the overall system.

Fixes:

  • Separating the roles:
     — AI is responsible for computation and enrichment.
     — BI is responsible for providing visualization and establishing decision-making criteria.

4. Successful AI models will not have a business impact.

  • Working models do not necessarily affect the user's workflow in the context of the business.

  • If no action is taken on the model's output, it has no business value.

Fixes:

  • Everything in relation to:
     — One workflow
     — One decision
     — One measurable KPI

5. Trust is a foundational aspect; it's not optional.

  • Users will reject systems in which they do not understand how to use.

  • Once trust is lost, it is rarely regained.

Fixes:

  • Include lineage, confidence scores, and an explanation of how things work to the user.

  • Be transparent with users regarding the output from the beginning.

💡Key Takeaway: 

Artificial Intelligence does not fall short in implementing business intelligence due to difficulty… rather, it falls short because it is disassociated from decision-making and lacks trust.

👉 LIKE if you have ever viewed an AI dashboard that seemed substantial but was of little to no benefit.

👉 SUBSCRIBE now for concise, useful information on AI/BI and actual applications.

👉 Follow Glenda Carnate for applicable implementation in production.

👉 COMMENT “AI/BI” if you are developing within this arena at this time.

👉 SHARE this with an individual creating an AI dashboard or developing a data product.

Reply

or to participate.